Monday, December 12, 2016

December 12, 2016: Ontario legislature stands against the BDS movement

By Michael Regenstreif

On December 1, the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, voted overwhelmingly to condemn the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

Motion 36, submitted by Conservative MPP Gila Martow (Thornhill), said the legislature should: “Stand firmly against any position or movement that promotes or encourages any form of hatred, hostility, prejudice, racism and intolerance in any way; Recognize the longstanding, vibrant and mutually beneficial political, economic and cultural ties between Ontario and Israel, built on a foundation of shared liberal democratic values; Endorse the Ottawa Protocol on Combating Antisemitism; And reject the differential treatment of Israel, including the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement.”

The motion passed with a vote of 49 in favour and just five opposed. The governing Liberals and the Progressive Conservative Party – the official Opposition – supported the motion while the New Democratic Party was opposed.

Almost half the members, including three-quarters of NDP members, and almost all Ottawa-area MPPs were not in the legislature at the time of the vote. The only Ottawa member present was Progressive Conservative Lisa MacLeod (Nepean-Carleton), who spoke in favour of the motion during the debate.

With the vote, the Ontario legislature follows the House of Commons, which passed a similar motion in February. Comparable motions have also been passed by the United States Congress and 16 U.S. states.

Among the criticisms of the BDS movement is that it unfairly places entire responsibility on Israel for lack of progress in resolving Israel’s conflict with the Palestinians, and completely absolves Palestinians – both the Palestinian Authority, which holds power in the West Bank, and Hamas, which holds power in Gaza – of any accountability at all. This is despite the fact that the Palestinians walked away on numerous occasions from nearly completed agreements and have used every subterfuge at their disposal to avoid further negotiations – despite Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s repeated invitations to sit down without preconditions and negotiate a peace agreement and Palestinian state.

And, while I don’t believe that all BDS activists are antisemitic, or, antisemitic in their intent, antisemitism is at the root of the BDS movement in that it unilaterally stigmatizes the world’s only Jewish state with all responsibility for the situation. This is what renowned human rights activist and former justice minister of Canada Irwin Cotler has referred to as “the new antisemitism” in which Israel is singled out as “the Jew among nations.”

Pro-BDS groups, though, like to paint themselves as the true human rights activists and deny there is any element of antisemitism in their actions or intent. But, just two days before the BDS vote in the Ontario legislature, pro-BDS groups at Ryerson University in Toronto prevented the Ryerson Student Union from even voting on a motion put forward by Ryerson Hillel in support of Holocaust Education Week at the school.

Holocaust Education Week was not about Israel. It was about education and commemoration of the worst genocide in history – a genocide that was perpetrated just over seven decades ago, in the lifetime of many students’ grandparents, against the Jewish people. To stand against Holocaust education and commemoration is nothing but antisemitism.

If those pro-BDS groups were truly about human rights activism, and if they were not at all antisemitic, they would be among the first standing up in support of Holocaust education and commemoration – not blocking it.

As mentioned, pro-BDS groups like to paint themselves as human rights activists, or as peace groups. But, really, their entire raison d’être is to delegitimate the State of Israel. No less a figure than Norman G. Finkelstein, the former DePaul University professor who is perhaps the world’s most vocal and visible Jewish anti-Zionist, agrees. In a 2012 interview, he attacked the BDS movement, which he repeatedly referred to as a “cult,” for its “silliness, childishness, and a lot of leftist posturing,” in seeking to hide its true goal: the elimination of the State of Israel.

Although the Ontario motion rejecting BDS was put forward by an opposition member, it’s important to note the support it received from the government was unequivocal.

“I want to make this clear,” said Minister of Transport Steven Del Duca, “the Ontario provincial government does not support the BDS movement, or any other positions or movements that attempt to divide our society. Rejecting the boycott of Israel is in keeping with Ontario and Canadian tradition.”

Our legislature has done the right thing.

Monday, November 28, 2016

November 28, 2016: An appreciation of Leonard Cohen, 1934-2016

By Michael Regenstreif

Leonard Cohen, the legendary Canadian poet, novelist and singer-songwriter, died November 7, at age 82.

Although the cause of death was not announced, he was known to have been in poor health recently.

Cohen was born in Montreal to a prominent Jewish family. In 1934, the year he was born, his paternal grandfather, Lyon Cohen, ended his 15-year tenure as founding president of Canadian Jewish Congress. His maternal grandfather, Rabbi Solomon Klinitsky-Klein, was a Talmudic scholar. His father, Nathan Cohen, a clothing manufacturer, died when the boy was just nine years old. Masha Cohen, his mother, from whom he inherited a love for songs and poetry, died in 1978.

Growing up, Cohen studied extensively with his rabbinic grandfather and was profoundly influenced by him on several levels. In much the same way that he and the rabbi would spend many hours discussing the meaning of a single sentence, Cohen said he often devoted similar amounts of time, sometimes more, to a turn of phrase in a poem or song. As well, there are the biblical and Judaic themes in much of his work.

As a McGill student in the early-1950s, Cohen began to make his mark as a poet. His first book of poems, Let Us Compare Mythologies, was published in 1956, and Cohen quickly became one of the Montreal’s major English-language literary figures. In 1957, along with mentors Irving Layton, Louis Dudek, Frank Scott and A.M. Klein, he was recorded for “Six Montreal Poets,” a Folkways record album. Other acclaimed books of poetry soon followed.

In 1963, Cohen’s first novel, The Favorite Game, was published. Cohen’s protagonist, Lawrence Breavman, the son of a prominent Jewish family from Westmount who loses his father early and achieves literary fame as a university student, was clearly based on himself. The book vividly describes Breavman’s coming of age, his move from beyond the parochial world of his upbringing into bohemian circles and the conflicts of a Jewish man falling in love with a gentile woman.

A second novel, the abstract and somewhat difficult Beautiful Losers, followed in 1966. That book was an experimental, post-modern novel about the obsessions of a love triangle that seemingly drew its inspiration from the conflicts between the French, English and indigenous peoples in colonial times and in the contemporary world of Quebec’s Quiet Revolution.

In his youth, Cohen had learned to play guitar and dabbled with traditional folk songs. As a McGill student, he played in the Buckskin Boys, an amateur country and western trio. Eventually, Cohen’s interest in music and poetry would intertwine in song. Around the time that Beautiful Losers was published, Cohen turned his attention to songwriting.

The 1960s were an exciting time for innovative songwriters. Another Jewish songwriter, Bob Dylan (born Robert Zimmerman), had combined the musical influences of Woody Guthrie and traditional American folksongs with the literary influences of beat poets and novelists like Allan Ginsberg and Jack Kerouac, thereby redefining what could be accomplished in a song. Cohen was drawn to that creative challenge and it was as a singer-songwriter that Cohen would attain his most enduring fame.

In 1966, Cohen met folksinger Judy Collins and sang two of his earliest songs for her: “Suzanne,” filled with images evoking Old Montreal, probably the great Montreal song; and the harrowing, Brecht-like, “Dress Rehearsal Rag.” Collins quickly recorded both songs for her album “In My Life,” and Cohen’s career as a major songwriter was launched. In late-1967, his own first LP, “Songs of Leonard Cohen,” was released to critical acclaim.

Jewish and Jewish-influenced themes were evident in many of Cohen’s songs. One of the key songs on his first album was “The Stranger Song.” Although Cohen voiced the song as an observer singing in the third person, the listener is left with the impression that Cohen himself is, indeed, the stranger. Cohen’s imagery of the stranger in this song is highly influenced by the thesis of Jewish philosopher Franz Rosenzweig that the Jewish people are, by definition, strangers in the Diaspora countries in which they live. Another early example of Jewish themes in Cohen’s songwriting can be found in “Story of Isaac,” based on the biblical story of Abraham preparing to sacrifice his son, from his second album, “Songs from a Room.” Here Cohen sang in the first person, from Isaac’s perspective, of being led to the sacrifice. Ultimately, Cohen turned the song into a rabbinic-style morality lesson on the ethics of one generation sacrificing the lives of the next – and on the choices that both sides in a conflict must make. (For more on this song, see my “From the Editor” column in the September 22, 2014 issue.)

Cohen’s song “Who By Fire,” from the 1974 album, “New Skin for the Old Ceremony,” was based on “Unetaneh Tokef,” a prayer from the Yom Kippur liturgy; and his most famous song, “Hallelujah,” which he first recorded in 1984 on “Various Positions,” and which, ultimately, became his most-covered song by other artists, invokes images of King David composing his own “Hallelujah” and praising God just as he’s tempted by Bathsheba, and of Samson and Delilah.

Cohen was in Greece when the Yom Kippur War broke out in 1973. Immediately, he flew to Israel with his guitar and performed concerts for the soldiers at the front lines, an episode that he would invoke many years later when his commitment to Judaism was called into question.

In 1994, Cohen withdrew from public life and moved to the Mount Baldy Zen Center in California. Zen is a branch of Buddhism that stresses meditation and offers no discussion of God. In 1996, he became a Zen monk. According to Cohen, his practice of Zen was not contradictory to being Jewish. In “Not a Jew,” a 1997 poem, Cohen wrote:

“Anyone who says

I’m not a Jew

is not a Jew

I’m very sorry

but this is final

So says:

Eliezar, son of Nissan,

priest of Israel;

a.k.a. Nightingale of the Sinai,

Yom Kippur 1973;

a.k.a.

Jikan the Unconvincing

Zen monk,

a.k.a. Leonard Cohen…”

In 1999, Cohen left Mount Baldy and returned to his home in Los Angeles. In 2002, he told an interviewer that the years he spent at the Zen centre had strengthened his commitment to Judaism. “You just enter into that 4,000- year-old conversation with God and the sages,” he said.

Cohen continued to pursue Jewish themes in later songs.

One of the most striking songs on the 2001 album, “Ten New Songs,” was “By the Rivers Dark,” a song inspired by Psalm 137, attributed to the prophet Jeremiah, which laments the destruction of the first Temple and the exile of the Jews to Babylon.

On “Dear Heather,” released in 2004, Cohen used three songs to recall his roots in the Montreal literary scene and to pay tribute to Frank Scott, Irving Layton and A.M. Klein, three of his poetry mentors. “To A Teacher,” dedicated to Klein, is a musical setting of a poem with several Judaic references that was written while the older poet was battling mental illness. The poem was first published in Cohen’s 1961 book, The Spice-Box of Earth.

In 2004, Cohen discovered that most of his life savings had been embezzled by his manager and, in 2008 – unable to recover the funds despite prevailing in a lawsuit against the former manager – he embarked on the first of a series of concert tours over the next five years. With an ensemble of world class musicians and back-up singers, Cohen performed hundreds of masterful, meticulously planned and long concerts of songs drawn from across his career. The energy, stamina and commitment to the material, and to the audience, Cohen displayed on stage, despite being in his 70s, was remarkable.

Cohen released several live albums and DVDs from those tours and continued to write new songs.

“Amen” from the 2012 album, “Old Ideas,” is a long, prayer-like song, perhaps a conversation with God. Part of the song is inspired by the Tashlich ceremony of the Jewish New Year, when the sins of the past year are symbolically cast into the water, but many of the images suggest the song is a deep rumination on the Holocaust; perhaps an attempt to address the most difficult question of modern Jewish philosophy: How could God have allowed the Holocaust to occur?

“Born in Chains,” from the 2014 album, “Popular Problems,” is a prayer-like meditation on the biblical legend of the Jewish Exodus from slavery in Egypt, and on faith lost and then found again. It is a song Cohen said he worked on for 40 years – a statement that may have been an allusion to the 40 years the Children of Israel spent wandering in the desert following the Exodus.

“You Want It Darker,” the title song from Cohen’s new album, released just last month, is another song Cohen seemed to sing directly to God. “Hineni, hineni, I’m ready my lord,” he sang in the chorus, echoing the words of the biblical patriarch Abraham as he prepared for the near-sacrifi ce of his son Isaac. But, while Abraham was preparing to face the death of his son, Cohen seemed to be confronting his own mortality. Cohen was joined on the song by Cantor Gideon Zelermyer of Congregation Shaar Hashomayim – the Montreal synagogue Cohen grew up attending – and the Shaar choir. The choir’s haunting harmonies are heard from the beginning of the song, Cohen himself sounds like he’s singing from the depths of his soul, and the final minute of the song is devoted to Zelermyer repeatedly, and seemingly distantly, singing the word “hineni”; a stunning performance from Cohen, the choir and the cantor.

Cohen also had a connection to one of this community’s most enduring institutions, having spent the summer of 1956 as a counsellor at Camp B’nai Brith of Ottawa.

I met Cohen several times over the years in Montreal, and he was always very gracious. In 2004, I heard from his older sister, Esther Cohen, who died in 2014, that he appreciated an article I’d written about him for the Canadian Jewish News to mark his 70th birthday.

Cohen is survived by his son, Adam, also a singer-songwriter, his daughter, Lorca, and two grandchildren. He was laid to rest with a private graveside service at the Congregation Shaar Hashomayim Cemetery in Montreal on November 10 attended by immediate family and a few close friends.

Note: Parts of this article are taken from, or based on, earlier articles and reviews I’ve written over the years for the Canadian Jewish News, the Ottawa Jewish Bulletin, and the Folk Roots/Folk Branches blog.

Monday, November 14, 2016

November 14, 2016: Lessons for all of us from the Ari Shavit scandal

By Michael Regenstreif

One of the most prominent stories in the international Jewish media in recent weeks has been the sudden fall from grace of the prominent Israeli journalist and author Ari Shavit. We’ve had half a dozen articles about the Shavit situation in the online Ottawa Jewish Bulletin.

The roots of the Shavit story go back to the now infamous 2005 recording of real estate mogul and reality TV show star Donald Trump bragging to Access Hollywood host Billy Bush about committing serial sexual assaults.

The tape came to light on October 7 during Trump’s campaign as the Republican U.S. presidential nominee – as I write, the election is four days away, but the results will be known by the time you read this. While Trump dismissed his highly offensive comments as just “locker room banter” about acts he did not actually commit, there have been numerous women who have since stepped forward to describe incidents of Trump behaving similarly over the years to the way he described on the tape.

In the wake of the Trump story, an editor at the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles asked reporter Danielle Berrin if she would write an article about sexual assault.

Berrin wrote a column titled, “My sexual assault, and yours:Every woman’s story,” published October 19, in which she describes how she was sexually assaulted by a prominent Israeli journalist and author when she went to interview him at his hotel.

Berrin did not name the perpetrator in her column, but did mention several physical traits that led to speculation she was talking about Shavit.

The following week, Shavit acknowledged that he was, indeed, the man Berrin was talking about and issued an apology, of sorts, for the incident. For him, it was a “misunderstanding.”

“Until I read this week the article she published, I felt that we had a friendly meeting that included, among other things, elements of courtship. I did not for a moment think that sexual harassment had occurred. But what I saw as courtship, Berrin saw as inappropriate behaviour and even harassment from me,” Shavit said. “I apologize from the depths of my heart for this misunderstanding.”

It soon emerged that the incident with Berrin was not an isolated case. The Forward reported that J Street – a pro-peace Zionist group in the U.S. – had stopped using Shavit as a speaker at its events since a similar incident with one of its female employees who was accompanying Shavit to a J Street event where he was speaking.

This time, Shavit’s response was more appropriate. He resigned his newspaper and TV positions at Haaretz and Channel 10 in Israel and issued a statement that was much more contrite than his initial response to Berrin.

“I am ashamed of the mistakes I made with regards to people in general and women in particular,” Shavit said. “I am embarrassed that I did not behave correctly to my wife and children. I am embarrassed about the consequences of what I did.”

Shavit added, “In the last few days, I have understood that I have been afflicted by blindness. For years, I did not understand what people meant when they spoke of privileged men who do not see the damage that they cause to others. Now, I am beginning to understand.”

In social media discussions about the Shavit and Trump stories, I’ve read accounts by several women I know – and whose accounts I trust – of similar situations they’ve had to face in dealings with men in positions of power over them. And, when so many women come forward with such accounts, we have to realize they represent just the tip of the iceberg. Many women, for whatever reasons they may have, keep silent about such experiences.

There are lessons for all of us in the Shavit situation. Many men – I would hope most men – understand the boundaries of acceptable behaviour. It is time all of us, without exception, do.

In a follow-up column published November 1 in the JewishJournal, Danielle Berrin points to a “silver lining” from the scandal and that is in the thoughtful conversations about it taking place around the world, in the collective reaction to it from the Jewish community, and in the ultimate response from Ari Shavit himself in realizing he must take responsibility for his actions.

Berrin concludes by saying the “Jewish ability – indeed, responsibility – to engage in cheshbon ha-nefesh, accounting of the soul, and teshuvah, repentance and return, is a model for the world.”