June 15, 2009: Women are increasingly assuming top communal leadership roles

By Michael Regenstreif

The position of chair of the Jewish Federation of Ottawa – or president of the Vaad Ha’Ir as it was known from 1934 until 2005 – is the pinnacle of lay leadership in the Jewish community of Ottawa. This month, Donna Dolansky became the 34th person in the Federation’s 75-year history to rise to that esteemed position.

A long record of accomplishment as a seemingly tireless volunteer and community leader is something that Donna has in common with her 33 consummate predecessors. Same gender, though, is something she shares with only two: Maureen Molot, who was Vaad president from 1991 to 1993; and Barbara Farber, who served from 1997 to 1999. The position has been a male bastion for 71 of the past 75 years.

The fact that almost all past presidents and chairs have been men is not unusual. Look at most Jewish communities and you’ll see that almost all, if not all, of their leadership positions have been male bastions for most of their histories too. With the exception of organizations that are specifically for women, it is only in recent decades that we’ve seen women realizing the top leadership roles in Federations and major organizations.

It’s also worth noting that, for the first time in this Federation’s history, both the chair, Donna Dolansky, and the vice-chair, Debbie Halton-Weiss, are women.

Like many other Jewish communities, ours has been evolving. Where it was once unheard of for women to attain such top leadership positions, they now do. And, while it is still a rare enough occurrence that we take note when a woman attains a position like Federation chair, it is becoming more commonplace. In another generation or so, we won’t.

Something else worth noting is that, this year, again for the first time, all three recipients of the community’s annual awards are women. At the Federation’s annual general meeting this month, Ingrid Levitz received the Gilbert Greenberg Distinguished Service Award, Estelle Gunner received the Shem Tov Community Volunteer Award, and Jennifer Kardash received the Freiman Family Young Leadership Award.

Although women in the top leadership positions may still be somewhat novel, women – as exemplified by Ingrid, Estelle and Jennifer – have long been at the forefront of community volunteerism. When the Federation celebrated its 75th anniversary last month by honouring 75 of our most accomplished volunteers, 45 of them – a significant majority of 60 per cent – were women.

* * * * * * * * * *

The non-Orthodox rabbinate is another area that has been opening up to women in the almost-four decades since the Reform movement ordained its first female rabbi in 1972. Women rabbis are now well accepted in the Reform, Conservative and Reconstructionist movements.

There was an interesting item on the JTA wire recently about Sara Hurwitz, an Orthodox woman who had completed the studies needed to become an Orthodox rabbi. She studied under the guidance of Rabbi Avi Weiss, the director of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah in New York, an Orthodox yeshiva for men.

Instead of ‘rabbi,’ though, she was given a new title, maharat – an acronym for Manhigah Hilkhatit Ruhanit Toranit (spiritual, halachic and Torah leader). In other words, she is a rabbi in everything but name.

The JTA article went on to say that Rabbi Weiss and Maharat Hurwitz were founding a new school, Yeshivat Maharat, to train Orthodox women as maharats.

Will the very concept of women as clergy, even if they’re not called ‘rabbis,’ be accepted in Orthodox circles?

* * * * * * * * * *

In the April 27 Bulletin, we reported on the 2008 audit of antisemitic incidents in Canada from B’nai Brith Canada (BBC). There were, BBC reported, 1,135 reported incidents of antisemitism in Canada last year, a rise of 8.9 per cent from 2007. The number of antisemitic incidents in Canada, according to BBC, has risen every year but one over the past decade.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in the United States has just released its own audit of antisemitic incidents in the U.S., a country whose population is about 10 times that of ours. The ADL reports there were 1,352 antisemitic incidents in the entire United States in 2008, a decline of seven per cent from 2007. It was the fourth consecutive year in which the ADL has reported a decline in antisemitic incidents in the United States.

Can it really be possible that, proportionately, Canadians are about 10 times more likely to commit antisemitic incidents than Americans?

Or, is it possible that B’nai Brith Canada and the Anti-Defamation League have very different approaches about how or when to define an incident as antisemitic?

January 26, 2009: ‘If somebody was sending rockets into my house’

By Michael Regenstreif

As this issue of the Bulletin went to press, Israel’s three-week war with Hamas in Gaza seemingly came to an end when Israel said its goals had been met and declared a ceasefire.

Hopefully, the guns, bombs and rockets will remain silent.

As many of the speakers noted at the Ottawa Jewish community’s solidarity rally with Israel on January 8 – one of many rallies held in cities across Canada that evening – the loss of every innocent life in this war, Palestinian and Israeli, was a tragedy.

The Palestinians had such a tremendous opportunity to further their society when Israel withdrew its settlers and military from Gaza in 2005. Their leaders could have seized the opportunity to begin building a prosperous economy that would have lifted their people out of the terrible poverty they’ve known for too many generations. Instead, they fought what amounted to a civil war, resulting in Hamas seizing control from the Palestinian Authority.

Houses and other buildings and farms and greenhouses for growing food – left behind by the departed Israeli settlers – were not put to use by the Palestinians; they were destroyed. Imagine, in a society where too many children don’t get enough to eat, farms and state-of-the-art greenhouses that could have been used to feed their children are destroyed. Instead of building an economy, Hamas built rockets to terrorize nearby Israeli communities like Sderot and sent a terrorist squad into Israel to kidnap Gilad Schalit.

Last March 31, a delegation from Sderot came to Ottawa. They met with politicians on Parliament Hill during the day and with the Jewish community in the evening at the Soloway JCC, where they described what life in their community was like under the constant rocket attacks from Gaza.

In a conversation over dinner that March evening, Eeki Elner, one of the Sderot visitors, told me that, as a child of Holocaust survivors who came to Israel as refugees, he understands the terrible plight of the Palestinian refugees and fully supports the principles of trading land for peace and the two-state solution with the Palestinians.

“But Sderot is not in disputed territory,” he said. “The rocket attacks on Sderot are an attack on the very existence of Israel.”

Clearly, Israel could not allow the rocket attacks to go on forever. As Barbara Farber said at the January 8 rally, “It’s an unconscionable way to live.”

And as then-presidential candidate Barack Obama said on a visit to Sderot last summer, and reiterated this month less than two weeks before his inauguration, “If somebody was sending rockets into my house where my two daughters sleep at night, I’m going to do everything in my power to stop that. I would expect Israelis to do the same thing.”

By the start of the war, the range of the Hamas rockets reached far beyond Sderot, which lies close to the Gaza border. As Marty Davis tells us in his report on Page1, his community of Ashkelon, about 10 miles from Gaza, became a regular target of Hamas rockets. So, too, did the much further away Beer Sheva.

That is the sad state of affairs that brought Israel into the war with Hamas and to its terrible consequences for so many innocent people.

Obama has now begun his tenure in the Oval Office. As Thomas Friedman wrote January 13 in his typically astute New York Times column, the focus of Israel, and the Obama team, “should be on creating a clear choice for Hamas for the world to see: Are you about destroying Israel or building Gaza?”

* * * * * * * * * * *

Sid Ryan, the president of CUPE Ontario and long-time anti-Israel activist, wants Israeli academics banned from Ontario universities, unless they explicitly denounce the Gaza policies of the Israeli government (presumably in a way that meets his standards).

Would Ryan apply such a ban to Israeli Arabs or just Israeli Jews? Beyond issues of discrimination, any such ban would mean the utter abandonment of the principles of academic freedom to which our institutions of higher learning are supposed to aspire.

But don’t assume that Ryan speaks for CUPE. Paul Moist, the national president of CUPE, says “such a resolution is wrong and would violate the antidiscrimination standards set out in the CUPE constitution. I will be using my influence in any debates on such a resolution to oppose its adoption.”

I don’t suppose we should hold our collective breaths waiting for Ryan to propose the banning of Palestinian academics from Ontario universities unless they explicitly denounce the Sderot-Ashkelon-Beer Sheva policies of Hamas.